We are all familiar with the moniker, “crimes of passion.” I submit two facts. First, most crimes are mistakes, ultimately. And second, regardless of whether it is a mistake or a crime, the penalizing effect of one act of passion can become a life sentence.
I will begin by saying I am not a huge sports enthusiast. I will also admit this may seem like old news. But the principle of one mistake ruining opportunities for future victories is too often overlooked today, and cannot be overemphasized.
I am thinking of playoff game six between OKC and the Memphis Grizzlies. (I may not have the specifics exactly right, so forgive any errors.) Passions were high, as they always are in playoff series for an opportunity to play in the national championship game. The Grizzlies were losing what could have been the final game sending them to the next round, if they could pull off a win. If they lose, the series was going to be tied with one game left to determine the team to move forward.
One of the best players on the Grizzlies punched an OKC player during the last few minutes of the game. It was called a flagrant foul. Technical shot for OKC and the Grizzlies player was penalized one game, (the tie-breaking game), as well. OKC won and one final game was needed.
Seventh game in a race to four wins. Grizzlies top player sitting this one out in the penalty box. Needless to say, OKC beat the Grizzlies and moved forward. The Grizzlies went home.
It may be that the Grizzlies would have lost the final game, anyway. We will never know. What we do know, though, is that the Grizzlies were at a serious disadvantage because of that one punch – that mistake of passion.
Perhaps the player felt like the Grizzlies had already lost that game, so he might as well get a good lick in. He may not have planned it. He may have just lost control of his emotions.
Whatever the case, I’m fairly certain he didn’t think he’d get penalized with ejection from the next game. And that ejection may have been the life sentence of no victory, ever, for the ’13-’14 season.
Using the mistake of – crime of – passion as a justification does not diminish the fact that too often we are more passionate about the act we will perform than the supposed motivating feelings.
What was your “mistake of passion?” If it is still in progress, it may not be too late to reduce the penalty. Plead guilty and throw yourself on the mercy of the court of life’s consequences.
Once again my thoughts are moving towards misuse. Last week’s column, Overextended, could be seen in the same light. This theme resonates so much with me because many of the difficulties people face are direct results of some misuse or overuse of a beneficial trait, gift, talent, or skill. How often do we implement emergency mechanisms into everyday use?
“Emergency Exit Only: Alarm will sound” is one example. The door is not to be used for regular entry and exit. But clutch -starting my car is a real life instance where I caused a several hundred dollar repair by not doing a $60 correction.
I had a 1976 Dodge Champ when I was in college. A gasket leak allowed oil to get into the starter. I changed the starter, but didn’t fix the leak. I probably didn’t feel like delaying the starter replacement job by going to get the gasket. So off I drove.
Yes, a couple of months later, the starter went out again. I had this bright idea. “I will just clutch -start the car. There are enough hills in Birmingham so I won’t have to push it very often.”
One day, it started and cut off after a couple of seconds. Again and again I did this. The jig was up.
I had to pay for a tow to the mechanic. He discovered I had ripped all of the teeth off of the timing belt. Now I had to pay for a starter, gasket, and timing belt job.
The moral of this story is, it is normally less costly to fix the initial problem than to find a way to avoid dealing with it.
Whatever isn’t functioning properly in your individual life or in your relationships, get it repaired, soon. Say, “I’m sorry” today, if you know you need to. Start working on the project today, rather than wait until its almost due. And by all means, don’t use clutch-starting in place of the designed method.
A couple of weeks ago, my wife and I were watching Family Feud. If you are familiar with the game, you will know that two teams, usually families, play survey answer puzzles to win the chance for the $20,000 Fast Money round. The winning family picks two players for the Fast Money round. The goal is to win the money.
On the show we were watching, the winning family chose a teenager as one of the bonus round players. This round is fast paced and takes fairly broad life experiences and fast thinking to win. To me, it seemed that a teenager would not be the best choice for a player.
I began to think that the family’s goal was for the teenager to have fun. But the goal is to win the $20,000. Needless to say, the family did quite poorly. I may be wrong, but I think they lost sight of the goal.
This reminded me of a couple of other glaring instances of losing sight of the goal.
I was enrolled at Brookes Bible College, early into my Biblical Counseling and Pastoral Care Certification. I was talking with my father about some difficulty I was experiencing with one of my professors. I thought he was wrong about some point he was pressing. My dad reminded me that the goal was to finish the courses and get my certification. The goal was not to prove my debating abilities.
I had lost sight of the goal.
The other instance was with a very smart man I worked with. He was looking for another job because he was too smart to work where we did. He told me about an interview he had with a company where he could practice his specialty. “Man, the guy interviewing me didn’t even know the job. I had to correct him a few times…” he told me.
He didn’t get the job. I told him that he had lost sight of the goal.
In relationships, most often the goal is to have loving, or at least peaceful communion. Needing to be right about everything is a sign one has lost sight of the goal.
Most of us can think of at least one time where we missed out on a great opportunity because we lost sight of the goal.
If you remember the late ’80s into the ’90s, you may recall the rise of infomercials. The Ginsu Knife was one of the hottest sellers. Claiming to have the longest lasting edge of any knife ever, we were told it never needs sharpening.
“Watch this!,” the actor would scream. “Look how easily it slices a tomato. And slicing bread is a breeze.”
“But that’s not all!,” he would continue, excitedly. “Watch how the Ginsu Knife will cut a penny in half, and still slice bread. And, you can even cut a nail. Look, it still has no problem thinly slicing this tomato.”
On and on it would go. “Our Ginsu Knife will cut through anything.”
Once or twice… This is me talking now.
Were Ginsu Knives designed to cut pennies and nails? No. They were created to cut foods, fruits and vegetables. The show of cutting pennies and nails was twofold. First, for the viewers to see the durability, and second, to deceive us into believing the knife could be eternally misused, and still maintain its edge.
If you take nothing else from this column, understand that continual misuse or improper use of anything will render it useless for its intended design and purpose. To help young people understand this concept more clearly, I used to use Ginsu Knives in presentations.
I would go through the infomercial spiel. Then I would pull out a two by four with about twenty nails I had hammered into it. The more nails I sawed with the Ginsu Knife, the less smoothly it sliced tomatoes and bread.
The point was this. We are not created and designed to do some things that we insist on doing. We might get away with cutting a nail or two, but if we keep cutting nails, our edge will get dull. (You know what your nails are.) Once dull, we are unable to perform the tasks for which we were created.
And only the creator can put a new edge on a your knife.
There are almost too many magnets on cars to count. Yellow ribbons, blue ribbons, ICTHUS fish, Darwinian fish, names, and on and on. This doesn’t even take into account all of the stickers. People put magnets on their cars to make a statement or to indicate or show something that is important to them. Refrigerator magnets serve the same purpose.
I just started putting a magnet on my car.
I started a new job a couple of weeks ago with Green & Safe, one of the most highly respected contract Health Safety and Environment Coordinator, Training, and Supervisor firms in the South. I am honored to have this opportunity. No, I am not giving them a plug, I am making my usual real life correlation.
While completing the orientation and paperwork to officially begin the position of Contract Safety Coordinator, I was given a company logo magnet to place on my car. I will use my personal vehicle for company business. Along with the magnet there was essentially a contract. I’m calling it a covenant. It says, in so many words, that whenever I have that magnet on my car, I am to drive it like it is theirs. In fact, my car becomes a company car when I am on company business.
Think about this from a personal holistic perspective. Your life is your car. Whose magnet (logo) is on your life? Do you live your life according to the covenant you entered into in order to get the logo? That logo says something about what is important to you.
Whenever we wear a logo, unless it strictly and explicitly belongs to us, trademark, copyright, and patent, we are representing the owner. The owner of the logo has generally gone to great lengths to build a reputation. The owner of the logo has far more at stake than those who are allowed to put the logo on.
Whose logo are you wearing? What does it say about you and what is important to you? Are you honoring the work and reputation of the logo owner? And, when we are talking about life, you wear the logo 24/7.
While I do understand the need to protect property from those who would break in and steal, some people would do well to do a real risk assessment. There may be threats to our loved ones’ and our personal wellbeing, but how often do we go too far with the security? Is the threat we are trying to protect from legitimate? Is our perception or fear rational?
Too often we allow news reports to create a subtle paranoia in how we perceive what’s actually going on around us. The result is being “too secure.”
What do I mean, “too secure”? We have all heard reports of someone dying in a fire because they were locked in the house and couldn’t get the door open fast enough. Have you ever locked yourself out of the house when you ran to the car or mailbox? Have you ever looked all over the place for something you were trying to hide from someone, and inadvertently hid it from yourself? Here’s a good one. How many times do you have to click “Forgot Password”? Those might be examples of too secure.
Now for the life correlation. Is your life too secure?
We justify and explain it by saying we are just very private people, when actually we build extra walls, put up security bars and doors, renovate and have “safe rooms” added. All to keep people from getting too close. Keep people at arm’s length is one description. Well, just as in the examples I mentioned before, our security can backfire on us in our lives.
Security locks the door on both sides.
We have no close friends. We carry needless pains and burdens because we have no one with which to share. This is unnatural because human beings are designed to live in community with one another.
Are you familiar with the saying, “If you keep your hand closed tightly, no one can take anything out, but neither can anyone put anything in.” The same holds true with our lives. We miss out on some very meaningful relationships because we are too secure. We can all think of someone to whom this applies because they are the extreme. How true of us, though, to perhaps a lesser degree?
Our security keeps people out, but it locks us in, as well.
…can re-define victory for you.
If we do well with a specific tactic, that tactic may become our entire battle plan. We refine our skill using that tactic. We become less interested in and less effective at the other valuable tactics in our arsenal. If you want to become a boxer, a prize fighter, and you discover that the jab or the knockout punch is your best tool, you will soon learn that you cannot win every fight only jabbing, or waiting for the knockout shot.
On the positive side, many intended fighters have become medal winning weightlifters, bodybuilders, and coaches because they are good at it. Many running backs have become great quarterbacks through effective throwing on trick plays.
I have been sitting in my office working on the Worship Bulletin and sermon for Sunday for a couple of hours. I come out to get some coffee and I overhear the television. The View is on and the hosts are discussing a young lady who shared, on the show, that she had done some pornographic sex scenes to help pay for law school. I don’t know if the young lady was a guest on the show, or if the hosts showed a clip of the lady discussing her decision. But doing pornography was one of her tactics.
Although this is not why I brought it up, let me make my stance very clear. I am diametrically opposed to pornography. I do not believe God is in any way pleased with the pornographic industry. Far, far more evils come out of pornography than good – even if it is said that a husband and wife may enjoy looking at it together. There too many implications of sin and moral failure in: 1. Who is the couple making the movie, and are they married? 2. Is it OK for someone to watch them? 3. Is it OK for a husband or a wife to get pleasure from looking at someone other than their spouse? There are so many other murky issues to wade through, but that is not my point, today. I am encouraging you to have the conversation with your children, youth, and young adults, though. We live in a world where every person with a smartphone could have an x-rated theater – and video camera – in their pocket.
Back to my point. Earning what she would for each scene, it was determined that she would need to do close to 250 scenes to make enough money. One of the hosts said that the young lady now has a line of lingerie and “other things.”
I am going to make an educated guess that this young lady will soon, if she has not already, re-define victory to be a porn star, rather than a lawyer.
Be careful of how you determine what is an effective tactic.
This is a natural progression from the last two columns because my emphasis tends to lean more towards adjusting behavior to make the strongest changes in our lives. Remember my mantra. “You can’t think yourself into acting right, but you can act your way into thinking right.”
As we think about overstating, overcompensating is in the same family.
There are some very legitimate reasons people overcompensate. I am thinking of “over-correcting” when your car begins to slide out of control on ice, or if an oncoming driver crosses into your lane. You may react in a panic and overcompensate to avoid the danger. Often this over-correcting or overcompensating introduces new and different dangers.
If your home has been broken into, those who have not had the same experience may think you are overcompensating when you get an alarm, video surveillance, electric fencing, street lights all around your property, mace, a gun, and hire your own security company to patrol your driveway and yard. I’m being facetious, but you get the point. Some of our overcompensating is legitimate.
A few more examples are with someone who has been in an abusive relationship of any kind. They may opt to never get into another relationship or friendship. They may choose to never get married. Look at all of the benefits of life they miss out on. Someone who has been misled or hurt by their church may opt out of ever connecting with a church body again. Someone who lost a loved one too soon, or at the hands or wheel of another person may become angry with God and cut off that relationship. This overcompensating to insulate from hurt again may seem legitimate, but will ultimately be more harmful in the long run.
Fear of being unprepared or not measuring up may cause some to become lifetime students, never venturing out into the career world.
If you find yourself overcompensating in a way that is unhealthy, stop, think about the situation rationally, weigh the pros and cons, and find a balanced approach.
Two of the earliest recorded incidents of overstating, or exaggeration, and misstating can be found in Genesis 3:3 and 3:4. Adam likely overstated, Eve repeated it, and the serpent misstated.
I have come to believe Eve quoted exactly what was told to her by Adam. I also believe Adam added a little bit to what God told him in order to make an impression on Eve of how important it was not to eat that fruit. We do the same thing. We exaggerate because we want to impart how important something is to us, and we want it to be just as important to whomever we are sharing this with. We want them to feel what we feel and think what we think.
A quick recap: God told Adam that he and Eve could not to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Somehow between Adam telling Eve and Eve recounting the command to the serpent, the phrase, “neither shall you touch it,” got added. I sort of think Adam added the extra line to emphasize what God had said. I also believe that when the extra was added, it became untrue – it was not what God had said, and the untruth lost the power of the truth. (That is a theological discussion, but I wanted to throw it in there.) The overstatement or exaggeration, “Neither shall you touch it.”
Then in 3:4 we have the serpent twisting the meaning of God’s statement. The serpent said, “You shall not surely (immediately) die.” God had said, “You will surely (ultimately, eventually) die.” The serpent told the truth, but it was deceptive truth in that he wasn’t talking about what God was talking about.
There is probably not one person alive who could claim to have never exaggerated or misstated something. Even in our most mature adult lives. We all have used deceptive truth. I lived in St. Louis and worked in Illinois, about 15 minutes from my house. When I was asked to come in on overtime, sometimes I would say, “I will be out of town.” I lived out of town from my job, so I was not telling a lie, but I was being deceptive.
The intent of overstating, exaggeration, misstating, and deceptive truth is to avoid telling a direct lie. The judicial system understood, long ago, people’s ability to unconsciously stretch the truth or leave something out. In life we ought to strive for the Court’s expectation – “The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.”